Home > Communicating Promise > Archive for June, 2007

Archive for June, 2007

 

Service with a Capital “S”

June 24, 2007 | Written by Glenn Jasper

Over the years, I’ve worked opposite many types of clients.  I’ve had mellow clients and perpetually stressed-out clients. I’ve had experienced, seasoned communicators as clients and relatives of the CEO who had virtually no background in PR as clients.

And there’s one thing I have provided to all of them, no matter what … My opinion.

You see, there are two levels of "Service." There’s the Queen of Hearts in Alice in Wonderland level, which means that anything asked of you by the client receives a response of "Yes, Your Majesty."  And then there’s the kind of service taught to me a long time ago by Michael Kempner, CEO of MWW Group.  He said to me (paraphrase), "Our job is to tell the client what he needs to do, but then, at the end of the day, do what he wants to do."

Kempner’s point was that we, as experienced PR practitioners, know what is best for our clients.  And that is why he said that we have to tell the client what he needs to do.  But we don’t necessarily know what is going on behind the scenes for our clients’ organizations.  So ultimately, a client will have to weigh our advice, along with other factors we may not even understand.

Of course, shame on us if we aren’t "inside" enough to also have that information available to us.  So it all works together.  If we try to counsel our clients, rather than just blindly doing what they ask of us, we build credibility with them.  And once we build credibility, they bring us more inside.  

On the other hand, if we just do what they ask us to do, well, I guess no one wins.   The client won’t get our best thinking.  We won’t be as inside as we’d like to be.  And, perhaps worst of all, our job will become boring.

Here’s how silly it is to just do what the client asks:  Imagine you are conducting media training.  The client completes a mock interview, and your critique is, "Wow.  Excellent job.  Really top notch.  No criticisms here!  You are perfect."

No value, right?

Well, if we take that kind of ridiculous approach with other areas of our client relationship, it’s just as useless.

And I’m not just talking about editing news releases.  I’m talking about discussing strategy with clients.  So it’s not, "Would you like me to edit your news release?"  It’s "Why are you issuing this news release?  How does it help your business?"  And it’s offering your perspective on those questions, as well as your clients’ answers.

Of course, as with many areas of our industry, it’s a bit of a tightrope.  You want to give counsel, but you can’t ALWAYS disagree. No client wants an agency that is difficult to work with.  So you have to choose your spots.  And when you see you can add value by providing counsel, for goodness sake, do it.  

Otherwise, The Queen of Hearts may turn on you

Comments (0) | Permalink

Digg It | Reddit | De.lic.ious

 

Laying A Foundation

June 11, 2007 | Written by Glenn Jasper

Israel is a "today" kind of place.  In general, people are focused on what’s going on now, without paying as much attention to the long-term.  Two examples: Saving money is nowhere near as common as it is in the U.S.; and recycling is not done universally by any means. 

And it carries over to the business world as well, especially on the marketing side.  I’ll explain …

In the U.S., it is rare for a company to sign a deal with a communications firm for less than 12 months.  There is an intensive pitching process that ends with one firm being selected to represent the company for the next year.  If things go well during that year, the relationship will likely be extended.

In Israel, it works differently.  There are many "test" projects of 2-3 months.  If the agency proves itself over that short period, it’s only then likely the relationship will be extended.

You see, in The States, there is a general appreciation for momentum-building, both in terms of the agency-client relationship and as it pertains to media relations.  I remember my first six months at beenz.com, when media coverage was rare.  But we kept hammering away, kept announcing company milestones and achievements.  Then, whammo, it started to hit: Wall Street Journal, Time Magazine, USA Today …

And it was all due to the strategy of momentum-building and laying a foundation.

Israel’s just not there yet.  For some, PR equals a nice, big article in tomorrow’s paper.

And listen, I can understand why Israelis feel the way they feel.  After all, they doubled the size of the country in six days 40 years ago, right?

But it’s important to consider that the communications battle takes a little longer.  And once that becomes the standard understanding, the communications results will be stronger …

… and so might Israeli businesses.

Comments (0) | Permalink

Digg It | Reddit | De.lic.ious

Glenn Jasper

Glenn Jasper

 

Subscribe

 

 

Recent Post

 

 

Archive

 

Ruder Finn and Nefesh B’Nefesh secure international and domestic media

Ruder Finn and Nefesh B’Nefesh secure international and domestic media

Ruder Finn Israel secured top quality media hits in significant international publications, including The New York Times, CNN, AP, Reuters, and Fox.

Read case study

Discover our proven research, analysis and marketing service

Discover our proven research, analysis and marketing service

A unique and qualitative market research project, our Idea Lens® culminates in an objective and thorough evaluation of a client’s overall position within the industry. 

Read more

Ruder Finn Israel's online journal

Ruder Finn Israel's online journal

"Communicating Promise," The blog of Ruder Finn Israel's managing director, Glenn Jasper, discusses media and PR strategy, ethics, lessons, and learnings.

Read the Blog